Something to think on on 911’s anniversary.

See, they FOOLED us on 911. They SAID that the burning jet fuel was enough to weaken but not melt the steel. Well that would be TRUE if it were 100% BARE steel, but that is where the SECOND lie came in. That the initial impact “blew off” the fire proofing…in its ENTIRITY. Now, I am not a 911 truther, BUT, I am a pretty fair “mechanical” person, without giving away what I actually do. Lets just say, I KNOW the properties of mechanics, air flow, medical research, and the properties of metals, and leave it at that.

Now, WHEN was the World trade center built, I already know the answer, because the PTP themselves have let the cat out of the bag on WHERE I am going. Without looking, I KNOW the building was built pre 1972. Why? Because they admit to having large amounts of asbestos in these buildings due to all the subsequent health problems AFTER 911. I cheated now, looked it up, 1970. THAT means there was LITERALLY asbestos everywhere. Asbestos, is a mineral, and it is virtually INDESTRUCTABLE. You CANNOT burn it, or chemically alter it.

From Meslothemioma.com “Asbestos is a group of six naturally occurring silicate minerals made up of thin, microscopic fibers. Asbestos offers heat and chemical resistance, fireproofing and strength. As a result, asbestos was a popular additive to a variety of products. Individuals exposed to asbestos face health risks including cancer and other illnesses.”

Now note the LAST sentence. Asbestos is FIREPROOF, AND strong. It is WOVEN into materials, making THEM STRONGER and fireproof. The pre 1972 construction date, which limited, if not out right banned asbestos use in construction, is IMPORTANT. It means the world Trade center did not just have asbestos in insulations, pipe coverings, and gaskets, it had it in its fireproofing, concrete, floor tile, mastic, ceiling tile, and plaster. WHAT, you did not know that? Well of COURSE they would not tell you, THAT would reveal the lie.

Asbestos, prior to 1972, was “woven” into nearly EVERYTHING in the construction industry. From ceiling tile, to insulation, to floor tile, to glue (mastic) to plasters and concrete, to FIREPROOFING. IT was used to make all these materials STRONGER (weaving) AND literally fireproof.

I bet NONE of you have ever seen asbestos up close, I HAVE, and especially the insulations AND fireproofing. I have BEEN to demolished buildings, and the asbestos has to be ABATED first (removed, and it is NOT easy, most times they simply cut out the pieces, and bag them ALL and haul off, instead of TRYING to scrape it off) I say this because I KNOW via experience, that asbestos fireproofing is TOUGH, strong, long lasting, and DIFFICULT to remove. I do NOT think a jet liner impact, even coupled with an explosion, would be ENOUGH to remove ALL the LAYERS of fireproofing with asbestos. Yep, that’s right. there is NOT just ONE coat of fireproofing, there are MANY, another lie.

So, in my estimation, the burning jet fuel melting or softening the steel @ 2000 F is NOT the lie, the blowing OFF of the sure to be ASBESTOS fireproofing LAYERS in order to EXPOSE all that steel IS THE LIE. They just redirected you to the “shiny object” the fact that jet fuel burn temp is BELOW the melting point of SIMPLE steel which is @2500 F. See, they WANTED you to focus on that, so they could debunk it with the “softening and tonsil strength lies, and you would buy that.

They have OTHER problems on that, as the higher levels, like the 96th floor would have been made of steel ALLOYS which are LIGHTER, STRONGER, and have even HIGHER melting points due to the materials mixed to MAKE the alloy, like Cobalt, tungsten, etc. Couple THAT with the fireproofing LIE, and then you DO have a “conspiracy” avenue to pursue, why NO ONE did is a mystery.

What they did was a magic trick, they got you FOCUSED on the lovely assistant (the jet fuel burn temp) while you were NOT looking at the MAGICIAN that told the REAL lie that would REVEAL the trick. (The fireproofing “blew” off)

Plus, come on folks, do you REALLY think they designed twin 1300 foot tall buildings in the HOTBED of airports, on the Hudson, WITHOUT considering the possibility of a plane crash? The Boeing 747 was THE largest commercial airplane commonly in use at the time, at least domestically, so THAT would have been THE design limit, LIKELY 20% GREATER as is common practice for FUTURE events. You ALWAYS over design, not UNDER design. The 767, and 777 which wire BOTH in use at the time of 911 WERE physically bigger, but NOT heavier, lighter materials and alloys in the late 1980’s than 1969 when the 747 was introduced. the 777 used less engines (2 to 4 on the 747), and had more seating, but had relatively the SAME cruising speeds. (@ 600mph) SO, do I THINK they designed the World trade center to be FORWARD thinking able to handle a 747 PLUS, YEP. Plus you have to take into account that these buildings were DESIGNJED to withstand high winds (1300 feet tall ) and being EXPOSED to those winds via a river on one side, and the wind tunnel effect of all the OTHER skyscrapers in Manhattan. WATCH the rubble cloud for a visual of this effect. The designers HAD to take ALL that into account in 1970, and MORE due to the sheer size and foot print of the buildings, the concretes and steel, and the GLASS had to be SPECIAL stuff and DOUBLE tough.

But you say, this was 1970 tech vs 2000 tech. I say, ever here they DON’T build them like they USED to? That is TRUE, older stuff is usually OVER designed to a FAULT.

In closing, just something to consider. Do you KNOW who I bet REALLY knows this and the TRUTH, even BEFORE he got elected? Donald Trump. HE actually BUILT like skyscrapers IN NY DURING the same time frame. He KNOWS the specs required, AND the building codes. He ALSO knew the specs and codes required of the World Trade Center.

Think about that. WHO was one of the FIRST on the scene offering advice and literally MANPOWER, Donald Trump. HE was AMAZED the towers fell, WHAT does THAT tell you.