Contents
Forward 3
Ch 1 Her Turn 4
Ch 2 “Extremely Careless” 8
Ch 3 The Pied Piper 12
Ch 4 Barack to the rescue 15
Ch 5 Nunes learns the truth 20
Ch 6 October Surprises 23
Ch 7 Prelude to a setup 26
Ch 8 Spies and lies 31
Ch 9 the Patsies 35
Ch 10 Whoa Nellie 40
Ch 11 Dossier distribution 44
CH 12The Ally takedowns 47
Ch 13 Comey troubles 54
CH 14 Peter, Andy, and Lisa 58
Ch 15 I smell a rat 61
CH 16 The Insurance policy 65
Ch 17 the dam is showing cracks 71
Ch 18 Fruit of the Poisonous Tree 74
CH 19 The Players 77
Ch 20 Epilogue 94
Timeline 95
Conclusions 102
END 108
Ch 1 Her Turn
This is a story of a very corrupt woman, Hillary Clinton, who thought that she was entitled. She was due, She had bit her tongue, enabled her womanizer husband, and “stood by her man” like a good little trooper while he rose in the ranks politically, to even one day become the 42nd President of the United States (1992-2000). She then stepped aside and allowed the “chosen one” Barack Hussein Obama to become the first African American President (2008-2016). 2016 was to be HER turn, and the Obama Administration was bound and determined to make sure that Hillary would have all the help an then some she needed to make that happen.
Hillary as Secretary of State, (2009-2013) had been embroiled in several scandals. From the Benghazi (Sept 2012) and Muammar Gaddafi (“We came, he died” March 2011) debacles in Libya, to the Syria and Russian/Crimean/Ukraine conflicts which came to a head in early 2014, but were propagated on her watch as Sec of State. Do you remember the plastic red “reset” button with the improper translation into Russian in March of 2009? How about the giving of technology to Russia help set up their own “Silicon Valley” inside Russia? Worse yet, the selling of 20% of the US Uranium market to Russia in 2010 known as the Uranium One controversy, which Hillary Clinton had to personally sign off on as Secretary of State. Many think that The Uranium sale was a quid pro quo with several wealthy Russian investors, who were tied to the Rosatom side of the Uranium One deal contributing approximately $145 Million dollars to the Clinton Foundation after the Uranium One deal went through. Also, On June 29, 2010 Renaissance Capital, a Russian investment bank with ties to the Kremlin and which was promoting Uranium One stock, paid Bill Clinton $500,000 for a speech in Moscow shortly after the Rosatom acquisition of Uranium One was announced. (I guess then Putin and the Russians were the “good guys”, and “colluding” with, and taking large sums of money from them were OK.)
The Uranium One issue is a scandal unto itself, with MANY of the players that will follow in this document being key actors in the actual deal going through. From Secretary of State Clinton, to FBI Director Robert Mueller, to the Podesta Group of Tony and John Podesta, to Rod Rosenstein, and Andrew Weissmann.
FBI Director Robert Mueller’s investigation of the Russian uranium giant Rosatom was centered in Maryland, Tenam’s (Tenam Corporation is the US representative of TENEX, a leading global supplier of nuclear fuel cycle products and back-end materials) home base. The U.S. attorney in Maryland was Obama appointee Rod Rosenstein. The investigation was an intelligence probe into Rosatom officials. The investigation obtained an eyewitness, William Campbell, known as Confidential Source-1 (CS-1) in court documents, recordings, and emails. The evidence indicates Rosatom oligarchs sent millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation to buy access during Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s tenure on the Committee on Foreign Investment of the United States (CFIUS). CFIUS is the government body that provided the approval of the sale of Uranium One to Rosatom. Hillary, as Secretary of State, was the head of CFIUS.(1)
Rosenstein and Weissmann would go on to decline prosecution of several Russian Rosatom officials for bribery involved in the case including Rosatom’s main executive in the United States, Vadim Mikerin whom Whistle blower William Douglas Campbell had accused of orchestrating a racketeering plot involving kickbacks, bribes and extortion that corrupted the main uranium trucking company in the United States. Guess who was a lobbyist for Rasatom during that time? That’s right, the Podesta group. Guess who are major players in the Special Council “Russian Interference” probe of Trump and his Campaign? Rod Rosenstein was the one who appointed the Special Counsel Robert Mueller. Mueller’s top deputy in charge of most of the subsequent ancillary prosecutions is none other than Andrew Weissmann. It is all a big incestuous pile of the SAME players in all this mess.
Curiously, Rosatom, Tenam, and of course the Clinton Foundation were all cleared and approved in 2010 by Mueller and CIFUS, the sale went through. No conflicts of interest, no bribery, no quid pro quo. (Right.) This scandal was recently revealed to be under investigation again by John Huber. Stay tuned on this, but rest assured that there are simply too many connected players to be a “coincidence”.
Then we have the Clinton Foundation, purported to be one of the largest, corrupt, and most secretive “nonprofit” money gathering and distribution systems known. You and I would call that money laundering, the Clinton’s call it a “charitable organization” The Clinton Foundation was founded in 1997 as the William J. Clinton Foundation and from 2013 to 2015 was briefly renamed the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation. It is a non-profit organization under section 501(c)(3) of the U.S. tax code. The stated mission is to “strengthen the capacity of people in the United States and throughout the world to meet the challenges of global interdependence.” Its offices are located in New York City and Little Rock, Arkansas. In reality, it was a place where foreign entities, governments, oligarchs, lobbyists, politicians, and investors would donate money in the guise of “charity” only to be granted political favors later, especially during Hillary’s time as Secretary of State (2009-2013).
Despite taking in more than 2.5 Billion dollars in “donations” an independent audit found that only a small portion of that went directly to the intended charitable destinations like Haiti. Most of the money was used on employee salaries, trips, and “administrative costs”. During the 2016 Presidential Campaign, it was revealed that several foreign countries like Saudi Arabia (25 million dollars), the United Arab Emirates (5 million), Kuwait (10 million), and Qatar (10 million) had made large donations to the Clinton foundation. Qatar even had paid Bill Clinton 1 million dollars for a speaking engagement on his birthday in 2012.(2)
Was this a “pay for play” scheme, a quid pro quo? After all, the person in charge of foreign policies that could be favorable or unfavorable to these countries was the Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Reportedly between 2001 and 2016 Bill Clinton had racked up over 153 million dollars in speaking fees. Recall that during most of that time Hillary was running for President, an even bigger influence over policy than Secretary of State. Even Obama was weary of the Clinton Foundation. There was a 2008 ethics agreement that had been hashed out by top aides for President Obama and Clinton Foundation officials. The agreement provided an avenue for the foundation to accept donations from foreign governments that had never given before or were increasing the size of their donations. Those donations were to be submitted to the State Department for vetting. (The fox guarding the hen house? Who was Secretary of state?) But State Department officials have said the process was never used (Why am I not surprised). Curiously after the 2016 election loss, donations to the Clinton Foundation have reportedly dropped dramatically. WHY? Perhaps no more influence was available that could be bought and sold?
Like with the Uranium One scandal, the Clinton Foundation is also being re-investigated by John Huber. A good read on the Clinton foundation and the Uranium One stories is a book by Peter Schweitzer called ‘Clinton Cash’. Just now, on March 15 2019′ we find out from released Peter Strzok testimony that the DOJ had forbidden the FBI from investigating the Clinton Foundation during the time of Hillary’s email scandal. WHY? What were they hiding? Was this a bigger quid pro quo involving more than just Hillary? Even Obama? (This new angle will hopefully be looked at soon.)
In any case, Hillary had always avoided responsibility and accountability. She was infamous for her “At this point, what difference does it make” statements under Congressional testimony over the deaths of four Americans in Benghazi Libya (Jan 23 2013). Two private security contractors, Tyrone S. Woods and Glen Doherty, an IT person, Sean Smith, and US Ambassador Christopher Stevens were murdered in the Consulate at Benghazi Libya on Sept 11 2012 (an election year). Hillary and Obama had blamed the attack and the subsequent deaths on a pathetic, mostly unseen “anti-Islamic” YouTube video, never taking responsibility for HER actions of not providing adequate security in the powder keg that was Libya despite numerous requests from Stevens (we were the LAST major consulate left). She had failed to protect those DIRECTLY under her charge. In reality, Benghazi appears to have been used as a place where OUR weapons like Man-pads ( Mobile rocket launchers) , and Stinger missiles would be sold or given to the Libyan resistance. These same weapons would pass to Syria, and Yemen, finally winding up in the Syrian “freedom fighters” hands. You and I call them ISIS. That’s right, OUR OWN weapons were being passed to people that would later become ISIS who would then use those weapons to take over almost half of Iraq and Syria. ISIS was essentially created by OUR OWN government. They would also foment civil wars in Yemen and Libya. These wars would go on to cause a massive migration of Muslim “refugees” flowing through Turkey and into Europe. One cannot help but wonder if this was all a globalist plan. My only points of evidence to support this are thin, but not as thin as blaming the 2012 murder of four Americans on a “YouTube video”.
1)Why was our consulate moved from Tripoli to a known hotbed of “extremist” activities? (Benghazi is a port city, wonder what was being shipped and received)
2.Why was the security drastically reduced, outsourced to unreliable locals, and subsequent requests for more security denied? Did we think we were among friends?
3. Why were we the LAST major diplomatic contingent left in Libya?
4. Why was there a CIA compound not 1 mile from the “consulate” in Benghazi?
5. What was the CIA doing there in the first place?
6. Why when we had numerous assets available, like predator drones, and strike groups in Italy, was NO action taken to help the consulate or the private contractors who came from the CIA base?
7. Why were those private contractors ordered to stand down and not intervene?
8. Why was the task force that was to be deployed delayed NUMEROUS times, including to change in and out of uniforms?
9. Why did we not at least dispatch a few F35’s from our air base in Italy to break up the massacre at the consulate? Remember they were only about an hour or two away at top speed, and could refuel in mid-flight. The fighting wet on for over 13 hours, and those killed were STILL alive in the first few hours.
10. Why is their reportedly a predator drone live streaming the attack in real time video to the situation room at the White House. Was that predator armed?
11. Who gave the orders to stand down, and why?
12. Where was Obama and Hillary during the attack? Weren’t they the ones who were directly responsible?
13. Why did Obama and Hillary blame the attack on a YouTube video, and send Susan Rice to declare that on all the Sunday morning news programs?
14. Why was John McCain seen in a photo in Syria with the members who would become ISIS a few months later?
15. Why was ISIS allowed to form in the first place, let alone gather strength and take ground in Iraq and Syria?
16. Does this scandal tie in to the ones we are discussing? Was perhaps the Clinton foundation used to launder the money from those sales of weapons? Were that and other details of Benghazi discussed on the private email server?
17. IS that why the server was hidden and subsequently destroyed?
There is MUCH more to this story, and while it does tie in some of the players this document discusses, we must move back to the task at hand. May God have mercy on those who died and their families, and when this is all over, may they find peace, truth, and justice.
Ch 2 “Extremely Careless”
Hillary’s more recent and perilous scandal involved the usage of a personal Email server located in a basement in a closet of her Chappaqua NY house, and was later handed over to Platte River Networks (PRN) of Denver a private “mom and pop” IT security firm.
She was using a personal email account to conduct Government business AWAY from her secure SCIF (Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility) and far away from the eyes of either Congressional oversight or Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) accountability.
She was being investigated for having classified info in an unsecured place, a felony and a violation of the espionage act. Her server was discovered in March 2013 by accident when a hacker named “Guccifer” (NOT the same as Guccifer 2 discussed later) widely distributed emails sent to Clinton from Sidney Blumenthal (a former White House aide to Bill Clinton, and confidant of Hillary’s that was BANNED from working in the Obama Administration by Obama himself.), which Guccifer obtained by hacking Blumenthal’s email account(3). The emails involved Benghazi, and might have been “classified” Blumenthal had no security clearance. Congressional testimony and documents Clinton had to turn over on Benghazi (Summer of 2014) led Congressman Trey Gowdy to reveal that ALL Secretary Clinton’s emails were being routed NOT to her State.Gov email, but to Clintonemail.com, a huge violation of the law, especially if ANY classified info was in those emails. Many people speculate that numerous people in the Obama Administration were using the Clintonemail.com server to communicate, including Obama himself under an alias. (WHY? What did they all have to hide?)
A huge Congressional investigation was started March 2, 2015, which would lead to a criminal investigation by the FBI (July 2015). Hillary’s emails and the server, as well as her phones, IPADS, and laptops, would all be subpoenaed at that time. But to Congressional shock, tens of thousands of emails were missing, (Dec 5 2014) and it was discovered that the server itself had been wiped and destroyed by the program Bleachbit sometime between March 23 and March 31st by a Platte River Network employee. This was almost a month AFTER all those documents AND the server had been subpoenaed.
Hillary would claim that the deleted emails some 33000 of them, were for yoga, her daughter Chelsea’s wedding, funeral arrangements, and correspondence with her Husband Bill. (Who is widely known to NOT use email) Most of her Government issued Blackberry phones and IT devices were DESTROYED with hammers, a HUGE crime. Was this obstruction of justice? The few phones she did turn over were missing their sim cards, making them worthless…ANOTHER criminal violation. All that did not matter to Hillary; she was now running for President, all this would pass, after all this was HER time.
James Comey would clear Hillary of any wrong doing the “server scandal” (later called the Midyear Exam) on July 5th 2016(4), the heart of the Presidential campaign, even though Comey spent six minutes describing the things Hillary had done, and how they were all crimes, He came to the conclusion that no “reasonable” prosecutor would take up her case. (We later find, through released Page testimony that James Baker, the General Counsel for the FBI, in fact DID want to prosecute Hillary) Comey stated that even though Hillary had apparently violated the law, she had NO intent, and really did not understand the classification process, even though Hillary had been Secretary of State, a US Senator, and a First Lady and KNEW or should have known all about classified info handling. She had even put out guidelines to her own department FORBIDDING the EXACT thing she was doing (using a private email to do government business).
Comey concluded Hillary had not violated the “letter” of the law, gross negligence; she was only “extremely careless” and had no ‘intent” to do so, even though the hidden server, missing emails, and destroyed devices PROVED that in fact she did.
Despite the clear evidence, Comey declined prosecution. It would later be revealed by Comey that his original charging report had been changed by Peter Strzok to read “extremely careless” instead of the Comey words to the letter of the law “grossly negligent”(5), and also that it was Lisa Page who suggested that “intent was needed”, this occurred in MAY of 2016 BEFORE Hillary had even been interviewed.
Comey had inadvertently revealed that Hillary was being cleared of the crimes BEFORE she was formally interviewed. How nice of him to “fix” this little problem for her. Curiously Obama had used the nearly the EXACT wording that would be changed in the report when he was interviewed about Hillary’s case by Fox News Sunday on April 10 2016(6). Stating “I continue to believe that she has not jeopardized America’s national security,” Obama said in an interview on “Fox News Sunday”. “What I’ve also said is that — and she has acknowledged — that there’s a carelessness, in terms of managing emails, that she … recognizes” Had Obama just obstructed justice? At the least had he INFLUENCED Comey’s decision? Had he basically told the DOJ NOT to charge Hillary?
Now, we find out from the recently released Lisa Page Congressional testimony, that Obama’s DOJ had basically forbidden the FBI from CHARGING her, and that Lisa Page herself DID suggest the need for “intent” even though the law specifically says intent is NOT needed(7).
Mr. Ratcliffe: “Okay. So let me if I can, I know I’m testing your memory, but when you say advice you got from the Department, you’re making it sound like it was the Department that told you: You’re not going to charge gross negligence because we’re the prosecutors and we’re telling you we’re not going to –”
Ms. Page: “That is Correct.”
And then there is the actual law: 18 U.S. Code § 1924(8). Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material States : “(a) Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than five years, or both.
It seems Ms. Page, Hillary, Comey, and Strzok have some explaining to do. Also just who in the DOJ had the authority to tell the FBI to NOT prosecute Hillary? It seems to me it could only come from the Attorney General or ABOVE level. I thought Loretta Lynch was recused? Sally Yates perhaps? Higher? Obama? Would that not be obstruction of justice if they did?
The fact that James Comey, the FBI director was having a news conference pronouncing whether or not to prosecute Hillary was a scandal it of itself. Why was the FBI director, and not the Attorney General Loretta Lynch making the decision? After all, the FBI’s job was to investigate crimes, NOT prosecute crimes. That decision to prosecute crimes was supposed to lie in the Department of Justice, and its head Attorney General Lynch. Why was Comey heading this up?
Well, it seems that AG Lynch had a conflict of interest, and was forced to recuse herself. She had had an “impromptu” meeting with Hillary’s husband, former President Bill Clinton, on a tarmac at Sky Harbor International Airport in Phoenix Arizona on June 28th 2016, mere days before Hillary was supposed to be informed if she would be indicted or not for her private server.
The meeting was on a 110 degree day, and was pure “happenstance” according to both Clinton and Lynch. (Even though BOTH were under Secret Service protection, and BOTH would have ALL their activities cataloged) This meeting was in “secret”, and was revealed to the world by a local reporter who just happened to be at the airport that day. We all were NEVER supposed to know this meeting had happened.(9)
They had met for 45 minutes on board Lynch’s government issued plane, and had claimed they only discussed golf and grand kids. Even though it was 110 degrees, even though NO record of Bill Clinton or Lynch has ever been produced to validate that ANY golf was played that day by either, and despite the fact that Lynch has no grandchildren to discuss. We were all supposed to believe that NOTHING improper had happened, and that Hillary’s pending indictments had not been a topic. (Sure)
Lynch had previously DENIED that Hillary was even under investigation, and had instructed James Comey and others in her department to describe the blatant criminal investigation into Hillary’s server, NOT as an investigation, but as a “matter”(10) (HUH?)
Anyone with eyes could see that there WAS in fact a criminal investigation (Midyear Exam). Why would Lynch seemingly deny reality? Was the fix in? (YES, as we see there was already apparently a decision in place from the DOJ to not prosecute before Comey’s announcement or Hillary’s interview with Strzok, which BOTH happened after the tarmac meeting.)
Lynch was forced to recuse herself (Even though she insists she didn’t, she deferred the decision to the FBI and Comey) shortly after the meeting was discovered, and she named Comey as the arbiter of the “matter’. Why? Normally when an AG recuses a case, the task then goes to the next in command, the Deputy AG. At that time it was Sally Yates or Dana Boente. Why would they be bypassed for Comey, who reported DIRECTLY to Yates? Why was the FBI deciding whether or not to prosecute? I thought the FBI investigated crimes, and the DOJ prosecuted crimes found from those investigations. Was this abrogation even legal? The answer is yet unknown , as all things discussed on the tarmac that day are highly classified, and have not been released, even though there is probably both transcripts, audio and video of the meeting. Someday we will see, but rest assured this meeting was NOT about “golf and grandkids”, more likely, it involved a quid pro quo (Latin for: this for that) for Lynch in a future Hillary administration. Was Lynch offered a Supreme Court seat in exchange for “helping out Hillary”? One was coincidentally available as Anthony Scalia had just mysteriously passed away. We may never know the Truth, but those tapes SHOULD prove quite interesting indeed.
Hillary would be “interviewed” by Peter Strzok a senior special agent for the FBI and Special Agent David Laufman over the July 4th weekend(11). Strzok will be important later. Even though his interview with Hillary has been partially released in the form of 302 notes, we have not yet seen the full unredacted version. It was reported that Hillary seemed confused as to the security policy, and had “not recalled” many things that had happened, including that a “[C]” outside of a paragraph meant “classified” a widely accepted notation that anyone who had a security clearance, let alone a former Secretary of State, should have known. Curiously, Cheryl Mills and Huma Abedin, two of Hillary’s top aides at the State department, were allowed to sit in on the interviews as “counsels” for Clinton. What the hell? Weren’t these too also implicated in this scandal? Didn’t they work with Clinton at State? Didn’t they ALSO have Clinton email accounts? Didn’t they know all about the hidden server? Weren’t they too therefore complicit? Why the heck would they be permitted to be there to “represent” Clinton as “attorneys”? Isn’t that an OBVIOUS conflict? At the least would these two not be witnesses against Clinton for their knowledge of the server?
Strzok, would later be implicated in text messages uncovered by the DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz between Strzok and his mistress Lisa Page (who was a lawyer for FBI on loan from the DOJ). Strzok would in those texts, profess his loyalty to Hillary whom he referred to as the “future President”, and his utter contempt for Donald Trump, who he said hoped would lose “100 million to zero in the upcoming election.”(12) Most of the 50000 or so texts from Page and Strzok have either been deleted(by Robert Mueller and his team or been “lost” by the DOJ. The few we HAVE seen paint a VERY biased picture by both Page and Strzok FOR Hillary and AGAINST Trump. We will come back to that later.